Getting a grip

This weekend, I believe I learned how to keep the diffusion in control, by slightly underexposing to retain a bit of the focus. When I expose as usual, too much light is let in through the diffusion holes in the aperture disc, which completely washes out the brightest parts of the image. The flip side is that underexposure may push noise in the shadows to unwanted levels, but usually that’s not a problem to me since I can either use or suppress it during the b+w processing.

Sushi? That way

I must also say that I sometimes like the sun ray effect you get around direct light sources within the viewframe. To much of them, and the image is completely spoiled, but when the light source is not too bright, the result may occasionally look really lovely. Okay, it’s almost not photography any more, but anyway. In the image above, the rays came through a bit too strong, but I liked them anyway. It’s like the sign points in that direction, and as if there were blinking lights over there that called for you.

I think I’m getting a grip of this little creature now. But I have also started to look around for other ways to get the diffusion effect. I would love to use for instance my Summilux, which is both sharp and contrasty, together with a diffusion filter. I have seen that there are Schneider filters for still photography, previously only being available for motion film equipment. There are filters for overall softness (Classic soft), but the one I found most interesting diffuses only on the lighter areas in the view and retains all shadows (Black frost). They seem to come with a hefty price tag, though… The classic solution to use a pair of stockings is perhaps the most viable solution, who knows, black stockings might do the trick with the shadows. :-)

This entry was posted in Photography and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

4 Comments

  1. Posted January 25, 2010 at 22:28 | Permalink

    Ove
    I have been at this so long I still carry a torn up stocking in my camera bag. Sometimes the old ways of getting an effect are the best and affordable at least. Your latest stuff has gotten me to experimenting with that old stocking now and then.

  2. Posted January 26, 2010 at 02:11 | Permalink

    Ove, I really like the recent results you’ve been getting.

  3. Ove
    Posted January 26, 2010 at 09:00 | Permalink

    Ray, I will really try out the stockings again, they might in fact be right what I need, no sophisticated $300 filters which I currently cannot afford anyway… It’s interesting that you still carry one with you, in the bag. They can be useful for other things to, like wrapping sensitive stuff.

    Thanks, Earl, I’m glad you’re enjoying it!

  4. Posted February 9, 2010 at 20:38 | Permalink

    Thanks for the underexposure tip – the diffusion disk can definitely be a bit tricky to get the “disk imprint” from intruding too much in the image.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • Welcome to my blog about this and that – ditt & datt in Swedish. The topics you'll find here are not always that general, though. You wont find anything on football, for instance. Moreover, all the light will most often be on photographs I made. In fact, if I tell something I find worthwhile telling, I usually stick a few of my photographs to the story. You could almost say this is about photography, and in a way you're right, it is. But it is also about what I see.